-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 287
update to k8s 1.30 libs and controller-runtime 0.18.4 #3336
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
go.mod
Outdated
) | ||
|
||
replace kubevirt.io/controller-lifecycle-operator-sdk => github.com/mhenriks/controller-lifecycle-operator-sdk v0.0.7-0.20240702040137-0d244a67055d |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/hold
Until this is not pointing to my github
/retest |
@awels I think something's up with FOSSA here |
Signed-off-by: Michael Henriksen <mhenriks@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Henriksen <mhenriks@redhat.com>
controller-runtime changed the API! Signed-off-by: Michael Henriksen <mhenriks@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Henriksen <mhenriks@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Henriksen <mhenriks@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Henriksen <mhenriks@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Henriksen <mhenriks@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Henriksen <mhenriks@redhat.com>
/unhold |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: akalenyu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hmmm so it is complaining about a dependency in vendor/github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru being MPL 2.0. Which is not compatible with our licenses. It is being vendor-ed in through github.com/openshift/library-go |
right.. I see it's coming from their dep. on |
@awels golang-lru code is not in vendor directory so we are not actually directly or indirectly using it. Are there exceptions for this? |
I can mark it as an exception indicating it is not being used at all. I wonder why it was flagged. You are right that it is not being vendored at all. |
/test pull-containerized-data-importer-fossa |
/test pull-containerized-data-importer-fossa |
/lgtm |
/test pull-containerized-data-importer-e2e-upg |
I think this failure is about doing a rebind when pod is still running? |
/test pull-containerized-data-importer-e2e-nfs |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #1097
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: